Let’s hear it for small packages

I might be out of Wire-related thoughts for this week, but it doesn’t exactly help that I can’t read anyone else’s. At Salon, James Hynes’s piece in the “Life” section warns me straight-out that it’s chock full of spoilers. Had I not stumbled upon a warning somewhere else on the interwebs, I would’ve probably had some joy denied me by Jacob Weisberg’s Slate onslaught. Only dear Heather Havrilesky deigned to handle this like a television program and not give it away all at once. But since her entire voice depends on the ritual of weekly viewing, it makes it seem like an either/or proposition: take The Wire as a visual novel deserving serious treatment, and you lose the right to enjoy it in episodic fashion.

I have as many weighty opinions on this show as anyone, but as I declared last week, that shouldn’t cost it its medium. It’s probably misleading to throw the word “innocence” out there, considering how far we are from sitcom territory. Yet if the discontinuous narrative seems to defy television conventions, can’t we also assume that it’s comfortable as defiant television—maybe even invested in that tension? To construe The Wire as an uninterrupted epic, is ultimately kind of an insult to the consensus “finest American broadcast ever.” If The Wire is masterful television, surely this also implies an original take on serialized process. Jumping ahead of viewers, which cuts them out of the discussion while denying the value of their incremental experience, is kind of rude. Most importantly, though, it’s neglecting part of what makes this such amazing art, whether you’re talking technical innovation, shrewd storytelling, or capacity to dispense enjoyment.

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

4 Comments on “Let’s hear it for small packages”

  1. Tom Says:

    Agreed entirely. Editors shouldn’t tolerate TV reviewers who are unable to write about a series without spoiling it. I actually turned down a chance to get the season 4 DVDs because I wanted to enjoy the series over the course of a few months, rather than gobble it down over a weekend (followed by endless re-viewings).

  2. PostmanE Says:

    A USA Today reviewer did a nice job of that today when talking about Grey’s Anatomy – which I largely detest, btw.

    http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/reviews/2006-09-20-greys-review_x.htm

  3. ReverendDrGladhands Says:

    Simon, himself, spoils entire seasons. I missed season three when it originally aired, and did my absolute best to isolate myself from any Wire conversations untill the DVD release. After viewing disc 1, I made the mistake of re-watching the first episode with the commentary on. Simon’s spoiled most of the season in the first five munutes.

  4. christycash Says:

    I know that you weren’t trying to be funny, rdgh, but for some reason your comment made me burst out laughing. i swear i’m laughing with you. just the idea of someone being so careful and then the show’s own creator — who more than anyone, you’d think, would want to preserve the pleasure of viewing — ruins it.

    DVD commentaries are something i by and large avoid. maybe i should get into them… after the season is over.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: