Start/Stop

The season has begun, but with it has begun a strange programming phenomenon. As you doubtless know, The Wire “premieres” each Sunday night on HBO, but episodes become available nearly a week earlier, if subscribers have access to the “On-Demand” system common to most digital cable providers. Add this to the fact that anyone with a shadow of credentials and a breath of promise about publicizing the show in print was speedily presented with the entire season on DVD in the past few weeks. HBO and the folks who manage The Wire seem single-minded in their hopes of getting anyone and everyone willing to devote an hour to get hooked on the show.

It makes sense, particularly given the broad, meandering and novelistic ways the series develops over each season, that the folks at HBO would be keen on grabbing viewers early, clutching them through a few episodes, and then relaxing their grip and watching to see whether viewers will remain seated for the remainder of the season. Even so, it’s a strange thing to see come to pass, television being what it is with the ratings and the ads and the “don’t touch that dial” and suchlike. Yet perhaps cable has finally realized how very free it is from the shackles of timeslots and Nielsens.

What this also says is “fuck you, water-cooler,” and that’s another strange side-effect. Even for this blog, the challenge of drawing in the disparate viewers of The Wire will depend in part on how we can manage the expecations of those who have religiously watched the show at its appointed hour, those who snapped it off On-Demand at the earliest possible time, and those who have already downloaded the whole season.

The New York Times has already written several pieces on the show to coincide with the start of the season. Yet immediately, the notion of a regular season’s schedule has been exploded, and HBO instead, in the interest, it would seem, of accomodating as many viewers’ desires as possible, has concentrated on snagging as many of those viewers as possible.

I hope that despite this programming chaos, conversation about the program will not be curtailed, compromised, or rendered meaningless. I know that some of the writers here are going to be watching on vastly differing schedules, and I think that it will ultimately allow for more lively, informed, and exciting discussions. After all, the best surprises to be found in The Wire are those that creep up on you when you’re not watching, when you’re watching again, or when you’re talking about episodes with someone else who cares.

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

7 Comments on “Start/Stop”

  1. shoals Says:

    i wonder how well the wire has ever lent itself to water cooler treatment. in large part because of the “visual novel” style, information is almost always incomplete, right up until the season’s end. yes, the show is plot-driven and thrives on surprise. but the full extent/true nature of events almost never gets revealed in a single episode, making it hard to yelp like something definitive has gone down from week-to-week. even broad strokes like stringer’s slaying feel less concrete than they should.


  2. “The Wire” on HBO

    ok look it’s a new wire blog, it has one post! https://heavenandhere.wordpress.com

    linked to from freedarko, likely the same people more or less – which sounds kinda… i’m not sure.

  3. jhoshea Says:

    oh hi dare – good luck!

  4. jhoshea Says:

    hey it knows ilx

  5. christycash Says:

    No I think there’s some serious water-cooler action with the show… even just watching them on DVD at the same time as others you get into big discussions about what’s going to happen next and what’s going on and all that.

  6. PDGirl Says:

    The problem with “watercoolering” The Wire is the amount of investment it takes for new viewers, y’know? When recommending the show (and, like a snob, I don’t even recommend it to everyone… is anyone else like that?) I practically forbid people from starting anywhere but the very beginning. Even if they enjoy it or “get it” by starting anywhere else, they’re totally cheating themselves if they don’t go back to the first episode.

    When people *do* invest in this show though–I think it’s more conducive to interesting (and actually productive) discussion than anything else I’ve ever seen. That’s one of the reasons I love it so much.

    It can be frustrating not to find other Wire viewers… i just moved to a new city where I hardly know anyone so I am talking about it w/ friends over e-mail or non-friends in this manner.

    I really hope HBO’s attempts at promotion finally take root… I hope Simon, et al. finally get their due (although it’ll make me a little sad if, say, there’s Emmy recognition that some of the phenomenal actors who are no longer on the show will obviously not get).

    Finally, re: the scheduling issues–I’m not gonna lie… I watch the episodes on Sunday night b/c they get me worked up for the new work week, then I can watch them a couple of times throughout the week, process, etc… Shoals was killing me on FD (and now here) with the talk about the new episodes… I may have to give in and go OnDemand.


  7. […] Guess I’ll have to read carefully.  Hell, one of their first posts adresses this very topic: What this also says is “fuck you, water-cooler,” and that’s another strange side-effect. Even for this blog, the challenge of drawing in the disparate viewers of The Wire will depend in part on how we can manage the expecations of those who have religiously watched the show at its appointed hour, those who snapped it off On-Demand at the earliest possible time, and those who have already downloaded the whole season. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: