David Simon everywhere
I know that further topical posts are coming about the season finale, but I wanted to note two David Simon sightings:
1. Slate’s interview with Simon is worth the time. Simon mostly repeats points he has elsewhere, but his arguments are, as usual, erudite and thoughtful. The interview is longer than I expected, which is a good thing.
2. Additionally, and, admittedly, in much more nerdy fashion, Simon’s Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets was excerpted in my Criminal Procedure casebook. The excerpt details the Baltimore police department’s adherence to Miranda v. Arizona, the watershed Supreme Court opinion requiring police to warn suspects of their rights to silence and an attorney when interrogating them in custody, and includes some academic reactions to Simon’s passages. (As should not be surprising to The Wire’s viewers, Baltimore’s finest are a bit lacking in their fidelity to Chief Justice Warren’s prescription. ) While the casebook’s reflection on Homicide is not timely, it’s interesting to see how Simon’s popular works have affected scholarly debate. You can find more of legal academia’s take on Baltimore’s police practices and Simon’s reporting here.
December 5, 2006 at 7:20 pm
His response to the question “sum up what the Wire is about” is one of the most intellient statements I’ve ever read in our news media and all he is doing is merely describing his art. I’m not sure if that is a testament to his brilliance or a condemnation of “intellectual culture” in our society. As with most things, probably both.
December 5, 2006 at 10:17 pm
This is such a nitpick, I hate to mention it: Homicide: Life on the Street was the name of the TV series, but the book is titled Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets.
December 6, 2006 at 1:05 am
Nice catch, JP! I’m going to fix the post accordingly. Thanks.
December 11, 2006 at 11:00 am
David Simon also has a new Q&A up on the web site associated with the Yahoo group…
http://members.aol.com/TheWireHBO
~ Jim
December 15, 2007 at 12:55 pm
very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
Idetrorce